Mommy, What Is Bill Gates Putting in My Christmas Dinner This Time?
"Gee... I Dunno Suzie. But It's That or Schwab's Crickets"
“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.” - Purportedly by the late Henry Kissinger, now gone to his reward (or lack thereof). Quote is, like many, debated. But the fact is, valid or not, all his actions did precisely that.
We also know that, just like Kissinger, the unelected arbiters of our health, the WHO, led by the Marxist Tedros, have already pushed the AGW scam, warning that the “meat supply” will trigger the “next pandemic” by causing deadly pathogens to jump from animals to humans. The Harvard Law School and Center for Environmental & Animal Protection at New York University have out a report from the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law & Policy Program predicting the next pandemic is likely to emerge from the U.S. meat supply, or from zoos, furs, and even pets. Sorry, but didn’t you already try that gambit with the fake Wuhan wet market caper? And that synthetic lab-grown “meat” promoted by Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum (WEF)? As Slay News has reported, a recent study found that lab-grown “meat” is actually 25 times worse for the environment than traditional beef production.
But… don’t let actual science bother you when there is beaucoup bucks to be made from Blackrock’s ESG scores! As Frank Bergman notes about that fake zoonotic transmission gambit, “ more and more evidence has emerged showing that the scientists who wrote “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” intentionally misled the public. “Proximal Origin,” which became the most-cited paper (a Letter to the Editor mischaracterized everywhere as a serious scientific review), claimed SARS-CoV-2 emerged through natural evolution and spread via a wet market in Wuhan, China. The paper alleged that there was no evidence to suggest genetic engineering or a lab origin. Private communications, however, reveal they suspected the virus had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and had been genetically engineered to infect humans. Mounting evidence also suggests this cover-up was led by then-director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Dr. Anthony Fauci, then-director of the National Institutes of Health Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D., and then-head of the Wellcome Trust Sir Jeremy Farrar. As noted in a July 20 Public Substack article by independent journalists Alex Gutentag, Leighton Woodhouse, and Michael Shellenberger: “The documents … show [Kristian] Andersen and his co-authors, Andrew Rambaut, Edward C. Holmes, and Robert F. Garry, conspiring — by which we mean they made secret plans to engage in deceptive and unethical behavior and — to spread disinformation. “Their conspiracy included coordinating with their ‘higher-ups’ in the U.S. and UK governments to deceive journalists … “We … today … release the full cache of Slack messages and emails covering the discussions between Andersen et al. as they wrote their influential ‘Proximal Origin’ paper, which Anthony Fauci and others in the U.S. government used to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis.”
Catherine Austin Fitts, former United States Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing and hedge fund director (hardly a “conspiracy theorist, n’est pas?) along with Dutch investigative journalist Elze van Hamelen tell us that lab grown meat is “insanely expensive” and plagued by bacterial and viral contamination, but of course, since lab-grown meat isn’t considered a pharmaceutical product, which means no human testing is required. And they will be using technologies made to develop pharmaceuticals – where, as we know, they aren’t so much concerned over safety or customers as they are recurring revenue. The will use cells that proliferate quickly- which elsewhere is known as “cancer.” We know who wins here – not your customers, but some Malthusian nutcases who lives in Redmond, WA., Davos, Switzerland and a bunch of evil nutcases who used to visit Epstein Island a lot. All ultra-processed food frankenfoods controlled by patents. Of course, just as Henry Kissinger said, if government and corporate entities are able to take control of the food supply via fake food, they also control the people. And of course, lab-grown meat isn’t considered a pharmaceutical product, so no human testing is required. “If this is brought to market, it’s a human experiment,” van Hamelen says. Let’s see… human experimentation without informed consent. That’s precisely what they hung the Nazi doctors over at Nuremberg. Oh yes. And to get this meat, they use fetal bovine serum (FBS), says Hamelen here. The blood is taken from living calves. How does this comport with your humane meat production you tout as Whole Foods? Since they will use synthetic “blood,” with precision fermentation, genetically engineered microbes, and artificial hormones (yum! And not allowed in the EU), micronutrients and minerals must be added, making, says Hamelin, the process “insanely expensive…” and notes that for the precision fermentation, “Contamination must be controlled down to 2 parts per billion, ‘because as soon as there is a contamination … it becomes riddled with bacteria, and you don’t have a cell culture, you have a bacteria culture.” Chemical engineer David Humbird for Open Philanthropy said in The Counter “Bacteria grow every 20 minutes, and the animal cells are stuck at 24 hours. You’re going to crush the culture in hours with a contamination event. … There are documented cases of, basically, operators getting the culture sick. “Not even because the operator themselves had a cold. But there was a virus particle on a glove. Or not cleaned out of a line. The culture has no immune system. If there’s virus particles in there that can infect the cells, they will. And generally, the cells just die, and then there’s no product anymore. You just dump it.” Catherine Austin Fitts in her Solari Report said “Synthetic food and lab-grown meat represent a new and dangerous chapter in what I call ‘the Great Poisoning.’ Despite an economics that makes no sense — and clear indications that these products are repugnant to consumers — money is apparently no object. Staked by massive infusions of venture capital and burgeoning public-private partnerships, items like cricket flour and lab-cultured ‘eggs’ have already made their way into grocery stores — with non-existent or misleading labeling designed to get past unwary consumers’ defenses.” Your customers want, instead, you to support the PRIME Act by US Rep. Thomas Massie, MD, to allow farmers to sell meat processed at smaller slaughtering facilities and allow states to set their own meat processing standards, all while allowing USDA inspections to continue as normal.
Overseas, we already have lab-grown chicken from U.S. startup Eat, starting in Singapore 2020.
Not that it matters, but in 2022, researchers with Boston Children’s Hospital revealed that using CRISPR in human cell lines increased the risk of large rearrangements of DNA, which could increase cancer risk. Other potential issues of concern and “unexpected effects” of genetically engineered food, according to the Center for Food Safety include:
Toxicity
Allergic reactions
Antibiotic resistance
Cancer
Immune suppression
Loss of nutritional value
Mercola noted “Those in favor of gene editing frequently stress the fact that it’s far more precise than natural breeding, the insinuation being that precision assures we only get the desired changes, nothing more and nothing less. But that’s clearly not true. Precision does not guarantee safety, because hundreds of unintended genetic changes can occur from a single alteration, and unintended genetic rearrangements and/or the disruption of gene expression, in turn, can result in: Alterations in the biochemical composition of the plant (or animal tissue); Production of novel toxins, and Production of novel allergens.” Test Biotech adds:
“... when both strands of DNA are cut, as is typically the case with the CRISPR/Cas, the ends of the chromosomes can lose contact with each other. If the repair of the break in the chromosomes fails, the severed ends can be lost, restructured or incorporated elsewhere. Chromothripsis otherwise seems to be relatively rare in plants. CRISPR/Cas applications can frequently result also in changes at genomic sites that are particularly well-protected by natural repair mechanisms. The risks cannot generally be estimated, so they must be investigated thoroughly in each and every case ... The recent findings shed new light on the alleged ‘precision’ of gene scissors: although the new technology can be used to target and cut precise locations in the genome, the consequences of ‘cutting’ the genome are to some extent unpredictable and uncontrollable. Plants obtained from new genetic engineering (New GE) cannot, therefore, be regarded as safe per se, and need to be thoroughly investigated for risks. Without exact genomic analyses, chromothripsis can be easily overlooked. It is, for example, not unlikely that it also occurred in plants obtained from New GE that were already deregulated in the US.” GMWatch agreed in their June 2023 article, where researchers discovered that CRISPR-Cas gene editing ends up wreaking havoc in the plant genome: “Recent scientific findings have revealed chromothripsis-like effects after the application of CRISPR/Cas gene editing in the genome of tomatoes ... Chromothripsis refers to a phenomenon in which often several hundred genetic changes occur simultaneously in a catastrophic event. Many sections of the genetic material can be swapped, recombined, or even lost if this occurs ...” Importantly, the same catastrophic cascades of gene swaps, recombination and loss also occurs in mammalian and human cells in response to gene editing. Actually, that’s been known for some time. See also the bioRxi article, A CRISPR-induced DNA break can trigger crossover, chromosomal loss and chromothripsis-like rearrangements.
Fact is, all this human experimentation is being done without the customer’s knowledge or consent. This is EXACTLY what they hung the Nazi doctors for at Nuremberg - human medical trials without the patient’s consent.
Rather, as Einstein said, “Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.”
For the record: We do not consent. But you are more than welcome to experiment on your own selves there in Redmond, WA., Blackrock and the mad scientists in Silicon Valley