“If you control the food, you control a nation. If you control the energy, you control a region. If you control the money, you control the world.” - Henry A. Kissinger (And yes, I am aware that like many quotes, this one is contested by some. But no matter. The fact is that this is the operative methodology being used by both government and Big Ag).
Most of you know about the mRNA vaccines proposed to be put into the meat and vegetables we eat. Already, the Sequivity shot is in pork in the U.S., and the now-fascist Australia is forcing ranchers to vaccinate for lumpy skin disease. Ned Kelly, where are you! (Kelly was the Bonnie & Clyde hero of the day; when Aussies were captured in WWII, the cheeky Oz soldiers repeatedly told their captors their name was “Ned Kelly.”)
As Exhibit A, Medicago has been working on growing plants that can vaccinate people against COVID – from their website is: “Canadian biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development, and commercialization of virus-like particles using plants as bioreactors to produce proteins, candidate vaccines, and medications). All this, without our legal, informed consent, which is the law – laws dating back to the Nuremberg trials, including the subsequent lesser known “Doctors’ Trials” in 1946, Nuremberg, Germany.
Similarly, see also article on Pairwise, an agricultural biotechnology company, created Conscious Greens Purple Power Baby Greens Blend, the first CRISPR-edited food available to U.S. consumers – and which won’t be labelled. At present, the U.S. has no specific regulations for gene edited plants. The same regulations that apply for conventional crops apply for GMOs, per Global Gene Editing Regulation Tracker. Regulators don’t consider gene-edited foods to be genetically modified organisms (GMOs), so they don’t have to be labeled. NaturalHealth236 says, it “Founded in 2017, Pairwise has raised over a whopping $115 million by (summer 2023) in its quest to put its products on Americans’ dining tables. Pairwise’s mustard greens are reportedly the first CRISPR-edited food to hit the U.S. market”; The Defender writes about our CRISR edited, greens here, noting it will not be labelled in that they are not GMOs.
Thanks for treating us like children in your arrogant, omniscient mad scientist hubris… or as one MIT scientist stated “the genetic code is 3.6 billion years old: It’s time for a rewrite”; see also Researchgate here on this, from Graham Dutfield in New Frontiers in the Philsophy of Intellectual Property, 2021. Or perhaps we might use the earlier version, “Even God Himself – or Zirhself in Bezos’ world – couldn’t sink her” scientific hubris. Or to update the trope, might that be the Ocean Ranger disaster in 1982, killing all aboard, or more recently the 2023 state of the art Titan submersible disaster, lost with all hands while descending to the Titanic?
And speaking of hubris and evil, here is Dr. Pierre Kory on what his take is on the government that allowed a similar monstrosity with the mRNA Covid shot, which is a good summary of the mendacity, hubris, suppression and worse from those who govern.
Not that this would stop the vile Bill Gates, who has said a tsunami of mRNA is coming, whether you like it or not. And those who disagree “will be excluded from society.” Tsunami is indeed the correct word – something the brings massive destruction of innocent life. Yes, the same Gates about whom Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson in court found Microsoft “abused its power” in the Microsoft antitrust trial in 1998. Jackson famously compared Gates to Napoleon and the company's executive team to "drug traffickers." Gates had "a Napoleonic concept of himself and his company, an arrogance that derives from power and unalloyed success, with no leavening hard experiences, no reverses," Jackson said in 2001. Jackson also described Gates' testimony as "inherently without credibility." Of course, this is the self-same Gates who announced in 2023 that he is funding a scheme to cut down 70 million of acres of forests in conjunction with Kodama Systems to reduce carbon dioxide. Yes, shades of the Vietnam war quote, “We had to destroy the village to save it,” concept. And of course, Gates will be at the public trough getting tax credits. Of course, CC Lab says biomass vaults are not viable: “The greatest risk for this project is the high cost to transport wood from dispersed sources to a single storage site. Transporting wet wood is significantly more time and energy-intensive than leaving it in the forest.” The same Gatesian idiocy of destroying trees to save the environment is now being applied to our food.
And the morbidly obese Melissa J Moore, Chief Scientific Officer from Moderna is the one credited with the quote “a coming tsunami of mRNA medicines.” She also wants mRNA injected directly into people’s hearts. No word yet if they will be using our tax dollars, or possibly hawking, say, eye of newt and wing of bat in their “medicines.” Her current work is using “the same mRNA sequence that went into their (Covid) spikevax” shot. Do you really want this woman below dictating what you, and your kids, should eat?
As a matter of fact, in contrast to the fascist (using the term literally, as defined by Mussolini in is definitive 1932 The Doctrine of Fascism) dictating as noted by the elite above, our democratically elected (gee… isn’t “democracy” the rallying cry to support Ukraine?) voted representatives voted to prohibit funding for human and animal vaccines grown in genetically engineered plants. See Vaccines Grown in Lettuce? Rep. Massie Asks House to Bar FDA, USDA From Funding Transgenic Edible Vaccines, by Michael Nevradakis, PhD, Sept. 27, 2023. Why won’t elites listen to democracy? The answer is, they won’t, and precisely for the reason noted: fascism, where the state has merged with big business to do an end run around democracy. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who introduced the amendment to protect our food, HR4368 – read it here - said he is concerned “we could really contaminate a lot of our food supply with unknown doses of vaccines that would deliver unknown dosages.” Claire Robinson, managing editor of GMWatch, agreed, telling The Defender. “Genetically engineering a potent immunogen into food plants is irresponsible in the extreme. All the usual risks of GM [genetically modified] plants — the DNA-damaging effects of the GM transformation process leads to changes in gene expression and biochemistry of the plant, which can include the production of toxins or allergens — apply to these vaccine-producing plants, with additional risks on top. “In the case of vaccine-producing plants, you are intentionally engineering a plant to elicit an immune reaction. This increases the level of risk exponentially.”
Adds Nevradakis: “According to a 2013 scientific paper, transgenic edible vaccines “are prepared by introducing selected desired genes into plants and inducing these genetically modified plants to manufacture the encoded proteins.” Such vaccines offer “several potential advantages” to conventional vaccine production techniques according to the paper, including a potentially lower cost of production that would be suitable for developing countries. Efforts to develop transgenic edible vaccines are not new — scientific literature on the topic dates back to at least 1999. What is new with some current attempts to develop transgenic edible vaccines is that they would be geared to deliver mRNA vaccines orally. “These are all genetically modified crops,” Massie said. “They’ve been injected with mRNA or spliced with DNA, with the intent of creating copies of that RNA or DNA. The plants are pretty effective at that.”
And Robinson added this approach is not new. “Scientists have been trying to produce edible vaccines in plants for many years and some testing has occurred in animals and humans.” However, she added, “Thus far, not one plant-produced vaccine has been approved anywhere, as far as I know. What does that tell us? Either they don’t work, or they are not safe, or both,” Robinson said.”
Of course, the Frankenstein scientists at UC Riverside, led by Juan Pablo Giraldo, Ph.D., an associate professor at UC Riverside’s Botany and Plant Sciences Department, in their “the future of vaccines,” are developing a lettuce which may look more like eating a salad than getting a shot in the arm via turning “edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories.” The project’s goals … are threefold, according to UC Riverside. “Showing that DNA containing the mRNA vaccines can be successfully delivered into the part of plant cells where it will replicate, demonstrating the plants can produce enough mRNA to rival a traditional shot, and finally, determining the right dosage.” The goal is to get around the current need to refrigerate current shot-style mRNA vaccines.
Truth is, vaccines are medicines, the elites do not have the public’s informed consent per the Nuremberg Code, and as vaccines are medicines, use and dosage must be carefully controlled. Citing from Nevradakis again, Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., a bioweapons expert and professor of international law at the University of Illinois who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, said that such research may also violate international law and globally recognized ethical standards. “The deployment of these transgenic edible vaccines would involve a gross violation of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation, and thus constitute a crime against humanity. Their release into the environment would violate the Precautionary Principle of customary international environmental law. They would also be subject to the same human health objections to GMO foods that are too numerous for me to list.” Claire Robinson added “What about cross-pollination and cross-contamination?” Robinson questioned. “People will ingest immunogens without their consent or knowledge... Plant-produced vaccines will have what is known as post-translational modifications to the intended protein product. You will not end up with just the desired protein product as it exists in its native form in the pathogen. These post-translational modifications will be specific to the plant, and in humans or other animals they will produce dangerous immune reactions. Even the responses to the desired protein product — the ‘vaccine’ — will vary from person to person because people respond differently to different proteins. Also, you can end up with proteins that are toxic or that are not folded properly, with the latter property meaning that they could cause prion diseases.”
Rep. Massie also cites a project 20 years ago where scientists wanted to grow a vaccine in corn to prevent diarrhea in pigs; some stray kernels got out, which got mixed with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. All which had to be destroyed. But those stray kernels may have easily been missed. The New York Times reported that ProdiGene, the biotechnology company that developed the corn crop, paid the U.S. government a $3 million fine “to settle charges that it did not take proper steps to prevent corn that was genetically engineered to produce pharmaceuticals from entering the food supply.”
Conspiracy theory? We already have a 2016 by Fort Valley State University in Georgia project which sought to “develop transgenic alfalfa plants expressing the CTB gene, to be used in plant-based edible vaccination systems.” The project was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and there is at least one scientific paper on this, in the journal Plants, entitled Long-Term Maintainable Somatic Embryogenesis System in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Using Leaf Explants: Embryogenic Sustainability Approach, Sangra, et al.
Here is the little Napoleon-with-a-cardigan Gates, the largest land owner in the US, in his own words, discussing his work with livestock with DFID, giving them “better genetics”: For after all, citing MIT AI Lab's Tom Knight again, "the genetic code is 3.6 billion years old. It's time for a rewrite.” (Journal of Biological Engineering). And since you may not like the Titanic, Ocean Ranger or Titan tropes, might we go back to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein then? Of course, the monster, as they say, “always returns to burn down the castle” where he started.
This is the same Gates who who created GM mosquitoes, which the NIH just turned into flying syringes (see Science.org article, Researchers Turn Mosquitoes Into Flying Vaccinators). Robert F. Kennedy says the Gates’ funded DTP vaccine killed more children in Africa than the diseases it targeted, citing the EBioMedicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal published by Lancet, in its 2017 article, The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment. Of course, neither HHS nor WHO performed a basic double blind study to determine if it worked - but why get in the way of beaucoup bucks to be had at the taxpayer trough, plus potentially make some kids sterile!
Thos of you old enough may well remember the Life cereal’s ad, “Let’s get Mikey to eat it” commercial. Only now we are all “Mikey,” and the downside is not just a cereal that may not be platatible, but our health and very lives. You need to push back NOW, on your representatives. Your very lives, and the lives of those you love, depend on it.