Are there mRNA vaccines in your meat?
... and more importantly, what you can do about it....
I hope the below can be used as a template for your own communication with your grocer. It may be the point now where we need to move to small, local butchers, etc. The “ask” below is very simple: The Nuremberg laws say informed consent is inviolable, and what they hung Nazi doctors over. All we, us poor, unwashed masses and deplorables here in flyover country, want to know is: does our meat have mRNA technology injected in it. Simple question, and all we want is a 5 second reply.
Chief Executive, Whole Foods
Jason Buechel, CEO
550 Bowie Street
Austin, TX 78703-4644
(512) 542-0215
Jason.Buechel@wholefoods.com
A number of your customers are concerned about mRNA vaccines being put into the meat we consume from your store. We spend many thousands of dollars per year in your store, and do not wish to have these vaccines, or mRNA agents, in either our meat, or our vegetables, without our legal, informed consent, which is the law – laws dating back to the Nuremberg trials, including the subsequent lesser known “Doctors’ Trials” in 1946, Nuremberg, Germany.
Yes, I am aware that there is no mandate to vaccinate livestock, per this article in Associated Press, No, farmers aren’t required to vaccinate livestock with mRNA vaccines, but that, of course, is not the question as AP disingenuously reports; rather, the question is, is this being done anyway? Do you do it with your products, and if so, are we consumers being notified? We get it that it is not mandated. But the question is, mandate or no, is it there?
Worse, as far as I’m concerned, AP article utterly misrepresents the truth, writing that mRNA is “typically gone within days of receipt”; rather, we know a fact that the mRNA from the Covid shot remains in the human body at least 60 days, if not longer – much longer. To wit: Per Dr. Peter McCullough in his March 17, 2023 article, Critical Role of Pseudouridine in Synthetic mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines “Fertig et al found lipid nanoparticles with mRNA were measurable in plasma for—15 days. Recently, Castruita et al demonstrated mRNA in blood out to 28 days. Roltgen et al have found mRNA in lymph nodes 60 days after injection. None of these studies demonstrated complete clearance of mRNA from a group of patients. This is worrisome since injections are recommended in some populations just a few months apart implying there will be stacking of long-lasting mRNA in the body without adequate opportunity for clearance and elimination.”
Former science editor for the NY Times Alex Berenson wrote, wrote about a little-noticed report in the highly respected, peer-reviewed journal Cell, which revealed that mRNA materials from the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines remain in lymph nodes for at least 60 days, while “free-floating spike proteins circulate at high levels in the blood after vaccination.” That’s not what the info-gatekeepers have been telling us, and not what AP implies. The famed journal Cell, itself, writes in Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination that genetic materials actually remain in the body for up to two months; or as here, in the Journal of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, the mRNA lasts for at least a month. The man who invented the mRNA platform, Dr. Robert Malone, says “When a vaccine is injected into a patient’s arm, the RNA from the vaccine, which is a modified RNA, is supposed to last for only a couple of hours, but a study from Stanford University shows that “the RNA sticks around for at least 60 days.” Malone also says using needle biopsies, these have shown RNA persists in axillar lymph nodes for at least 60 days. They didn't test any longer than that, so it could be far longer.
Japanese doctors reported summer, 2022 that mRNA-induced spike proteins from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” do persist in the body for at least several months post-injection.” See Persistent varicella zoster virus infection following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with the presence of encoded spike protein in the lesion in the Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy, authors Mayuko Yamamoto MD, PhD and Shigetoshi Sano, MD, PhD, out of Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Japan.
The AP article quotes U.S. Department of Agriculture spokesperson Marissa Perry: “There is no requirement or mandate that producers vaccinate their livestock for any disease. It is a personal and business decision left up to the producer and will remain that way,” and quotes Jason Menke, a National Pork Board spokesperson, that the “decision to use vaccines and other medical treatments to protect animal health and well-being are made by the farmer under the direction of the herd veterinarian.” Again, this is subterfuge and typical “waffle-ese” language. I repeat: Are we, the consumers, being notified with legal informed consent if our food is “vaccinated?” NOT that “it might be”; not that “it is the at the producer’s discretion”; not “the decision is made under the direction of a vet (but we ain’t gonna tell you, poor unwashed rubes in flyover country”; not that “it is not mandated (but we’re doing it anyway”); rather, the question is extrmely simple: are you complying with the law of informed consent, yes or no.”
You can save dozens of hours of time by just answering, officially, with a yes or no. Should take 5 seconds, with half of the time being to presd the “Enter” key.
The AP article does quote Suresh Kuchipudi, a veterinary scientist and chair of emerging infectious diseases at Penn State University, saying animals get immunizations do not rely on mRNA technology. Fine. What types do they get? Where do we find this simple information? Heck, there’s a database now for almost every mosquito found on earth – certainly this list can’t be that hard to come up with?
If you read nothing else, my request is simple: Can you legally verify that no mRNA-based vaccines or agents are in the meat or fish you sell? In turn, this will be disseminated to a wide range of readers I have.
AP – which as already shown itself to be misinformed (at best!) as above – tells us “are no animal vaccines currently licensed in the U.S. against any disease that use the same mRNA approach as humans’ COVID-19 vaccines.” So, if this is true, the task is even more simple: Just verify that we are not being fed mRNA in our meat or vegetables, and if we ever are, we will have informed consent. Again, a 5 second effort from a billion dollar company. Shouldn’t be too hard, one would think.
I understand that some may well consider this to be a“tin foil hat” concern (oh! And those types shouldn’t forget to add in the hackneyed, de rigeur cliche “conspiracy theory,” or that “Russia is behind this email”): To that end, I am citing studies from universities like UCLA, statements from President Biden, and more, illustrating that this issue is a valid, scientific concern. The information will be quite lengthy, with the sole purpose of proving that this is anything but “fake news.” You need not read all of this, but is there for reference.
Trained, active lawyers such as Tom Renz also feel unwitting vaccinated meat being pushed onto customers without their consent or knowledge is a valid concern. See his tweet on the subject here, or his substack here. Here’s the point for those dismissing this: the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association is 100% opposed to #Missouri #HB1169, which bars mRNA vaccines in meat. So, from my Logic classes from university, if they aren’t putting gene altering drugs in the cows, then why do they oppose the bill? The fact is that they probably are and want to do more. And if this is such a ludicrous concern, are all the House members in the state of Missouri also “ludicrous?”
Are all these peer reviewed studies “ridiculous?”
Vaccines can be Transmissible (I can produce dozens more but this is a start):
Bull JJ, Smithson MW, Nuismer SL. Transmissible Viral Vaccines. Trends Microbiol. 2018 Jan;26(1):6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 13. PMID: 29033339; PMCID: PMC5777272.;
Controlling epidemics with transmissible vaccines
Nuismer SL, May R, Basinski A, Remien CH (2018) Controlling epidemics with transmissible vaccines. PLOS ONE 13(5): e0196978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196978Bull JJ, Smithson MW, Nuismer SL. Transmissible Viral Vaccines. Trends Microbiol. 2018 Jan;26(1):6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 13. PMID: 29033339; PMCID: PMC5777272.
Article from Grain.org: https://grain.org/e/245
Transmitting to Livestock Through Feed: Lamphear BJ, Jilka JM, Kesl L, Welter M, Howard JA, Streatfield SJ. A corn-based delivery system for animal vaccines: an oral transmissible gastroenteritis virus vaccine boosts lactogenic immunity in swine. Vaccine. 2004 Jun 23;22(19):2420-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.066. PMID: 15193404; PMCID: PMC7126512.
Title: Vaccines in your salad? Scientists growing medicine-filled plants to replace injections (https://communityhubb.org/vaccines-in-your-salad-scientists-growing-medicine-filled-plants-to-replace-injections/)
Rybicki EP. Plant-made vaccines for humans and animals. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010 Jun;8(5):620-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00507.x. Epub 2010 Mar 11. PMID: 20233333; PMCID: PMC7167690.
mRNA IS Transmissible Through Breastmilk: Hanna N, Heffes-Doon A, Lin X, et al. Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(12):1268–1270. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3581
Title: Grow and Eat Your Own Vaccines? Using Plants As mRNA Factories
mRNA IS in the Food Supply Already:
mRNA being used in Australian Cattle - no country of origin labeling in America means it is here as well.
Vaccines May Permanently Alter DNA:
Aldén M, Olofsson Falla F, Yang D, Barghouth M, Luan C, Rasmussen M, De Marinis Y. Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022 Feb 25;44(3):1115-1126. doi: 10.3390/cimb44030073. PMID: 35723296; PMCID: PMC8946961.
And vaccines in our veggies “fake news?” Turns out that, for example, Univ. of California Riverside scientists, collaboration with UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon Univ are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories, per SciTech Daily here; similarly in News-Medical Life Sciences, in an article from two years ago, Researchers aim to develop edible plant-based mRNA vaccines, here, we are also told that plant based vaccines are in development. See also Edible vaccines by William HR Langridge at UCLA.
Similarly, Dr. Peter McCullough, who is the most heavily published cardiologist in history in his cardiology field, published Data on miRNA Transfer from Food into Human Body are Inconclusive. One study he cites said “Mar-Aguilar et al, reviewed the literature on experiments that attempted to get miRNA into food, ingested, and be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into mammals. In short, the studies were conflicting largely because miRNA was difficult to measure in vivo at the time the studies were performed. As you can see selected studies from the evidence table are not conclusive, however, some were able to show absorption.” But here is the thing: what if it ends up that absorption is taking place, and it is damaging? Some may want to take that risk, but I do not – and certainly not without my legal right of informed consent. McCullough also in his April 16, 2023 article Novel Vaccine Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: A Herald to Human Medicine Vaccines discusses the issue, noting “The mRNA and adenoviral DNA COVID-19 vaccine debacle in humans has set populations on edge, distrustful of poorly conceived genetic technology. Meanwhile the field has advanced considerably in veterinary medicine. While these shots may protect animals from pathogens over the short term, what are the implications for our food supply? Any of the genetic material transmissible to humans through consumption? Raw or cooked? These and other questions are coming up as more information is being brought forward….Aida and colleagues have graphically summarized the genetic technologies in use as of 2021 in veterinary medicine. In the consumer meat category at present, only swine are of concern given the use of plasmid DNA, replication incompetent viral vector, and RNA replicon products. Do these technologies cause noninfectious diseases in the animals? Can any of the genetic material survive denaturing during curing and cooking? How about pork intestines harvested for the production of heparin widely used in human medicine? It is conceivable that genetic incorporation of foreign RNA or DNA into humans and production of antigens for example, porcine endemic diarrhea or influenza A, could have untoward effects including autoimmunity similar to that with the COVID-19 vaccines?” It is thus that it is not unreasonable to simply ask for verification of something you supposedly aren’t doing anyways!
And is this following substack true? American Farmers To Begin Injecting Livestock With mRNA Shots This Month I simply don’t know, and am asking for clarification on this. Certainly, even NPR has reported on the possibility, such as here: Researchers Look To Cattle For Treatment For COVID-19 - NPR. The famed feminist icon Dr. Naomi Wolf discussed with attorney Tom Renz here. Is it “conspiracy theory” to take with sincerity something lawyers, PhDs and even the Missouri congress thinks is an issue?
The “ask” here is simply what the Missouri congress has in its bill:
a. That there is labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.
b. That if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘Hey, how does this spread? Does it shed? Is it spread through contact – through sexual contact? Or is there a way that this can spread?”
c. That we have legal, informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. I.e, that we have informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.
At the risk of being redundant, the ask here is single-fold and straight-forward: are mRNA vaccines being used in meat being sold at your store, and if so, is it labelled? If they are, why won’t anyone tell us? And even further, if these vaxes in meat injures people – as the Covid shot has, which we know from the official VAERS reports at the Dept of Health and Human Services, here https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html (people can debate exact number all they want; the fact is that the number is clearly greater than one! For example see peer reviewed journal Frontiers in Pharmacology’s article Profiling COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events by Statistical and Ontological Analysis of VAERS Case Reports) you are then in violation my Constitutional rights. Isn’t it my body, my choice? The request is not that you stop putting vaccines in our food, but rather simply labelling and disclosure of any gene therapy qualities (Moderna specifically calls this “gene therapy” in their documents).
Does “natural” in your descriptions include vaccines?! In other words, no antibiotics are given, say, to your chicken… but mRNA vaccines – of which the human Pfizer Covid shot is still, as of this writing – in Phase IV trials – is allowed? And has anyone there considered the market advantage – i.e, profit – by advertising that fact that “natural” means really natural, viz. no vaccines in the meat?
1. Here are links you can view – e.g., from the White House, from the Journal of American Medicine, the FDA, the British Medical Journal etc., to verify that these concerns about meat are not something “nutty”: White House Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology September 12, 2022; Bold Goals for US Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing March 2023; Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023; Food Dive March 23, 2023; Food Dive November 16, 2022; FDA Memo November 14, 2022; 9 Food Dive March 21, 2023; Food standards Agency Hazards Identification Report November 2022; Food Safety News March 24, 2023; Food standards Agency Hazards Identification Report November 2022, Page 8; Friends of the Earth, From Lab to Fork, June 2018 (PDF); Cell Metabolism, 2019; doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008; JAMA Internal Medicine February 11, 2019;179(4):490-498; BMJ February 14, 2018; 360; JAMA 2017;317(9):912-924; BMJ, 2019;365:I1451; BMJ, 2019;365:l1949; Journal of Cleaner Production September 25, 2022; 368: 133155; HR 2657 PRIME Act
2. Vaccines being in our meat is certainly of concern enough for the state of Missouri tendered Missouri House Bill No. 1169, the Informed Consent Bill, which you can read here.
3. The issue of vaccines in our meat, milk and even vegetables – without our informed consent, is a LEGAL issue for us. Fake news? Hardly. Dr. Peter McCullough, who just happens to be the most heavily published doctor in history in his area of cardiology, tweeted April 7, 2023 at tps://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1644358357346549761?t=JH1xrq2P4noczTmjK61Y9w&s=19, that the “Chinese successfully loaded cow's milk with mRNA and it was absorbed in the GI tract of recipients.” If people choose this, that is their choice. But for the rest of us, we do NOT tender our consent for this, and certainly not uninformed consent. Relative to this, the Nuremberg Code, which is a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation created by the court in U.S. v Brandt (Dr. Karl Brandt was one of Hitler’s lead doctors) says that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior orm of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.” You can read the code at the National Institute of Health website here: https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg%2BCode
4. We already know that The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing; it appears that we already have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows, which we are writing about As noted above in Missouri, lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef.
5. And New South Wales, the most populous state in Australia, already has cattle herds injected with mRNA for COVID-19, foot and mouth disease (FMD) and lumpy skin disease, per Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional NSW Paul Toole. He added that he has already written to the vaccine manufacturer to take his challenge to develop vaccines ready for use and manufacture in NSW by August 1 next year. In other words, there’s no science involved in the recent mRNA vaccination drive on cattle herds. Minister for Agriculture Dugald Saunders said U.S. biotechnology company Tiba Biotech has been given free rein to churn out as many mRNA injections as possible to supposedly protect Australia’s multi-billion livestock industry. He said it is critical to developing mRNA vaccines for FMD and lumpy skin as quickly as possible. If they want to do this, fine… but customer informed consent, per the Nuremberg Code is the law.
6. Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD has noted she has found structures looking like mRNA based vaccines in grocery store meat, at here on her substack at or as reported by Maria Zee here . Thus, you will forgive me if I simply would like assurance our meat is not tainted with experimental vaccines. If she is wrong, fine. Just tell us so!
Why don't we stop the stupidity of pretending that these concoctions have ANYTHING TO DO with viruses or other diseases. These are bioweapons designed to destroy our immune systems, sterilize us, make us into AI by-products and cull the overpopulation. If we won't take the damned things voluntarily they will force us with "mandates" or put it into our food and water. We are being crippled and murdered by our own "leaders." At least the likes of Attila, Ghenghis Khan, Stalin, Mao and Hitler did what they did openly and didn't try to pretend "it's for your own good!" You may rest assured that when something is presented as being "for your own good," it isn't.
Thank-you